Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision. The Supreme Court held that the Sixth Amendment guarantee of counsel is a fundamental right made applicable to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment. Thus, both federal and state courts are required to provide counsel in criminal cases for indigent defendants who are unable to afford to pay their attorneys.
Clarence E. Gideon was charged with felony theft in Florida in 1961. At that time, although counsel had been guaranteed under the Supreme Court’s 1932 decision in Powell v. Alabama, the Court's 1942 decision in Betts v. Brady held that lawyers were provided in felony cases only when there were “special circumstances,” such as mental disability or illiteracy. Under Florida law, court-appointed counsel was only provided to indigent criminal defendants in the case of a capital offense.
Being too poor to pay for counsel, Gideon was forced to defend himself at his trial. He was convicted and given a five-year sentence. While in jail, Gideon filed a petition for habeas corpus, arguing that he had been denied his constitutional right to counsel under the Sixth Amendment, applicable to the state of Florida through the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The case was argued before the Supreme Court on January 15, 1963. The Justices ruled unanimously in Gideon's favor, explicitly overruling Betts on March 18, 1963.
Although Gideon himself was not immediately freed as a result of the Supreme Court's decision, over 2000 individuals convicted in Florida were released in 1963 as a result of Gideon v. Wainwright. Gideon was appointed an attorney and got a new trial. The jury acquitted him after one hour of deliberation. (See additional facts and case summary)
Implications of Gideon
Since Gideon, the Supreme Court has recognized that the right to counsel is required at all critical stages of the justice process, such as identification lineups, arraignments, preliminary hearings, plea negotiations and the entry of a guilty plea. The more recent cases before the Supreme Court have focused on the expansion of the right to counsel under the Sixth Amendment.
The following are selected briefs filed in Gideon v. Wainwright. These briefs allow a researcher to understand the issues presented by the case, as well as the arguments made for and against each issue.
From his prison cell, Gideon appealed to the Supreme Court by filing a petition for certiorari written in pencil on prison stationery. He argued that he had been denied counsel in violation of the Sixth Amendment.